전체기사 최신뉴스 GAM
KYD 디데이
글로벌

속보

더보기

오바마 2013 국정연설 원문 - 1

기사입력 :

최종수정 :

※ 본문 글자 크기 조정

  • 더 작게
  • 작게
  • 보통
  • 크게
  • 더 크게

※ 번역할 언어 선택

President Obama's State of the Union Address:

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, fellow citizens:

Fifty-one years ago, John F. Kennedy declared to this Chamber that "the Constitution makes us not rivals for power but partners for progress…It is my task," he said, "to report the State of the Union – to improve it is the task of us all."

Tonight, thanks to the grit and determination of the American people, there is much progress to report. After a decade of grinding war, our brave men and women in uniform are coming home. After years of grueling recession, our businesses have created over six million new jobs. We buy more American cars than we have in five years, and less foreign oil than we have in twenty. Our housing market is healing, our stock market is rebounding, and consumers, patients, and homeowners enjoy stronger protections than ever before.

Together, we have cleared away the rubble of crisis, and can say with renewed confidence that the state of our union is stronger.

But we gather here knowing that there are millions of Americans whose hard work and dedication have not yet been rewarded. Our economy is adding jobs – but too many people still can't find full-time employment. Corporate profits have rocketed to all-time highs – but for more than a decade, wages and incomes have barely budged.

It is our generation's task, then, to reignite the true engine of America's economic growth – a rising, thriving middle class.

It is our unfinished task to restore the basic bargain that built this country – the idea that if you work hard and meet your responsibilities, you can get ahead, no matter where you come from, what you look like, or who you love.

It is our unfinished task to make sure that this government works on behalf of the many, and not just the few; that it encourages free enterprise, rewards individual initiative, and opens the doors of opportunity to every child across this great nation.

The American people don't expect government to solve every problem. They don't expect those of us in this chamber to agree on every issue. But they do expect us to put the nation's interests before party. They do expect us to forge reasonable compromise where we can. For they know that America moves forward only when we do so together; and that the responsibility of improving this union remains the task of us all.

Our work must begin by making some basic decisions about our budget – decisions that will have a huge impact on the strength of our recovery.

Over the last few years, both parties have worked together to reduce the deficit by more than $2.5 trillion – mostly through spending cuts, but also by raising tax rates on the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans. As a result, we are more than halfway towards the goal of $4 trillion in deficit reduction that economists say we need to stabilize our finances.

Now we need to finish the job. And the question is, how?

In 2011, Congress passed a law saying that if both parties couldn't agree on a plan to reach our deficit goal, about a trillion dollars' worth of budget cuts would automatically go into effect this year. These sudden, harsh, arbitrary cuts would jeopardize our military readiness. They'd devastate priorities like education, energy, and medical research. They would certainly slow our recovery, and cost us hundreds of thousands of jobs. That's why Democrats, Republicans, business leaders, and economists have already said that these cuts, known here in Washington as "the sequester," are a really bad idea.

Now, some in this Congress have proposed preventing only the defense cuts by making even bigger cuts to things like education and job training; Medicare and Social Security benefits.

That idea is even worse. Yes, the biggest driver of our long-term debt is the rising cost of health care for an aging population. And those of us who care deeply about programs like Medicare must embrace the need for modest reforms – otherwise, our retirement programs will crowd out the investments we need for our children, and jeopardize the promise of a secure retirement for future generations.

But we can't ask senior citizens and working families to shoulder the entire burden of deficit reduction while asking nothing more from the wealthiest and most powerful. We won't grow the middle class simply by shifting the cost of health care or college onto families that are already struggling, or by forcing communities to lay off more teachers, cops, and firefighters. Most Americans – Democrats, Republicans, and Independents – understand that we can't just cut our way to prosperity. They know that broad-based economic growth requires a balanced approach to deficit reduction, with spending cuts and revenue, and with everybody doing their fair share. And that's the approach I offer tonight.

On Medicare, I'm prepared to enact reforms that will achieve the same amount of health care savings by the beginning of the next decade as the reforms proposed by the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles commission. Already, the Affordable Care Act is helping to slow the growth of health care costs. The reforms I'm proposing go even further. We'll reduce taxpayer subsidies to prescription drug companies and ask more from the wealthiest seniors. We'll bring down costs by changing the way our government pays for Medicare, because our medical bills shouldn't be based on the number of tests ordered or days spent in the hospital – they should be based on the quality of care that our seniors receive. And I am open to additional reforms from both parties, so long as they don't violate the guarantee of a secure retirement. Our government shouldn't make promises we cannot keep – but we must keep the promises we've already made.

To hit the rest of our deficit reduction target, we should do what leaders in both parties have already suggested, and save hundreds of billions of dollars by getting rid of tax loopholes and deductions for the well-off and well-connected. After all, why would we choose to make deeper cuts to education and Medicare just to protect special interest tax breaks? How is that fair? How does that promote growth?

Now is our best chance for bipartisan, comprehensive tax reform that encourages job creation and helps bring down the deficit. The American people deserve a tax code that helps small businesses spend less time filling out complicated forms, and more time expanding and hiring; a tax code that ensures billionaires with high-powered accountants can't pay a lower rate than their hard-working secretaries; a tax code that lowers incentives to move jobs overseas, and lowers tax rates for businesses and manufacturers that create jobs right here in America. That's what tax reform can deliver. That's what we can do together.

I realize that tax reform and entitlement reform won't be easy. The politics will be hard for both sides. None of us will get 100 percent of what we want. But the alternative will cost us jobs, hurt our economy, and visit hardship on millions of hardworking Americans. So let's set party interests aside, and work to pass a budget that replaces reckless cuts with smart savings and wise investments in our future. And let's do it without the brinksmanship that stresses consumers and scares off investors. The greatest nation on Earth cannot keep conducting its business by drifting from one manufactured crisis to the next. Let's agree, right here, right now, to keep the people's government open, pay our bills on time, and always uphold the full faith and credit of the United States of America. The American people have worked too hard, for too long, rebuilding from one crisis to see their elected officials cause another.

Now, most of us agree that a plan to reduce the deficit must be part of our agenda. But let's be clear: deficit reduction alone is not an economic plan. A growing economy that creates good, middle-class jobs – that must be the North Star that guides our efforts. Every day, we should ask ourselves three questions as a nation: How do we attract more jobs to our shores? How do we equip our people with the skills needed to do those jobs? And how do we make sure that hard work leads to a decent living?

(계속)


[뉴스핌 Newspim]

[관련키워드]

[뉴스핌 베스트 기사]

사진
"스페이스X와 xAI 합병 막바지 논의" [뉴욕=뉴스핌] 김민정 특파원 = 일론 머스크가 우주 탐사 기업 스페이스X와 인공지능(AI) 기업 xAI를 합병하기 위한 막바지 논의를 진행 중이라고 소식통을 인용해 블룸버그통신이 2일(현지시간) 보도했다. 머스크의 로켓 및 위성 기업인 스페이스X와 xAI 측은 이미 일부 투자자들에게 이 같은 계획을 통보한 것으로 알려졌다. 익명을 요구한 소식통들은 이르면 이번 주 내로 합의가 발표될 수 있다고 전했다. 다만 협상은 진행 중이며 더 길어지거나 결렬될 가능성도 남아있다. 머스크는 자신의 소셜미디어 플랫폼 엑스(X, 옛 트위터)에서 블룸버그의 합병 보도 내용을 인용한 게시글에 "그렇다(Yes)"고 답글을 남겼다. 이번 거래가 성사된다면 세계에서 가장 큰 비상장 기업 두 곳이 결합하게 된다. xAI는 지난 9월 2000억 달러(약 291조 원) 가치로 자금을 조달했고 스페이스X는 12월에 약 8000억 달러의 가치로 주식 매각을 진행할 예정이었다. 합병의 핵심 촉매제는 AI의 끝을 모르는 자본 수요다. xAI는 현재 매달 약 10억 달러의 현금을 태우고 있다. 머스크의 다른 벤처들과 달리, 스페이스X는 가장 성공적이고 일관된 사업 성과를 내는 곳이다. 미국 기업 중 유일하게 우주비행사를 국제우주정거장(ISS)으로 정기 수송할 수 있으며, 나사(NASA)와 미 전쟁부의 핵심 로켓 발사 파트너다. 특히 9000개 이상의 위성을 보유한 스타링크 네트워크에서 나오는 수익은 로켓 발사 매출을 앞지르고 있다. xAI의 자본 집약적 사업을 지원할 잠재적 자금줄로 떠오르고 있다. 머스크는 앞서 xAI와 X를 합병했으며 지난 2022년 말 트위터를 인수한 직후 테슬라와 스페이스X에서 엔지니어를 차출해 온 바 있다. 앞서 로이터통신은 소식통과 회사 문건을 인용해 스페이스X와 xAI가 합병 논의 중이라고 보도했다. 기업공개(IPO) 시 약 1조5000억 달러 가치를 바라보는 스페이스X는 테슬라와의 합병 가능성도 논의한 것으로 알려졌다. 일론 머스크 테슬라 최고경영자(CEO)[사진=블룸버그] mj72284@newspim.com 2026-02-03 05:34
사진
케데헌 '골든', K팝 최초 그래미 수상 [서울=뉴스핌] 최문선 기자 = 넷플릭스 애니메이션 영화 '케이팝 데몬 헌터스'의 오리지널사운드트랙(OST) '골든(Golden)'이 제68회 그래미 어워즈에서 수상했다. '골든'은 2일(한국시간) 미국 로스앤젤레스에서 열린 그래미 어워즈 사전 행사에서 '베스트 송 리튼 포 비주얼 미디어(Best Song Written For Visual Media)' 부문 수상작으로 호명됐다. [서울=뉴스핌] 최문선 기자 = 케이팝 데몬 헌터스 스틸컷. [사진=넷플릭스] 2025.06.20 moonddo00@newspim.com 해당 부문은 영상 콘텐츠를 위해 제작된 곡 가운데 뛰어난 완성도를 보인 작품의 송라이터에게 수여되는 상이다. 이에 따라 '골든' 작업에 참여한 이재(EJAE), 테디, 24, 아이디오(이유한·곽중규·남희동) 등은 그래미 수상자라는 영예를 안게 됐다. 앞서 음악 엔지니어 황병준과 한국계 미국인 영인이 그래미를 수상한 사례는 있었지만, K팝 작곡가 혹은 음악 프로듀서가 그래미 어워즈를 수상한 것은 이번이 처음이다. 24는 "아쉽게 이 자리에 함께하지는 못했지만, 이 모든 과정에 함께한 저의 가장 큰 스승이자 가장 친한 친구인 '파이어니어 오브 K팝', 테디 형께 이 영광을 바친다"고 소감을 전했다. moonddo00@newspim.com 2026-02-02 08:36
기사 번역
결과물 출력을 준비하고 있어요.
종목 추적기

S&P 500 기업 중 기사 내용이 영향을 줄 종목 추적

결과물 출력을 준비하고 있어요.

긍정 영향 종목

  • Lockheed Martin Corp. Industrials
    우크라이나 안보 지원 강화 기대감으로 방산 수요 증가 직접적. 미·러 긴장 완화 불확실성 속에서도 방위산업 매출 안정성 강화 예상됨.

부정 영향 종목

  • Caterpillar Inc. Industrials
    우크라이나 전쟁 장기화 시 건설 및 중장비 수요 불확실성 직접적. 글로벌 인프라 투자 지연으로 매출 성장 둔화 가능성 있음.
이 내용에 포함된 데이터와 의견은 뉴스핌 AI가 분석한 결과입니다. 정보 제공 목적으로만 작성되었으며, 특정 종목 매매를 권유하지 않습니다. 투자 판단 및 결과에 대한 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다. 주식 투자는 원금 손실 가능성이 있으므로, 투자 전 충분한 조사와 전문가 상담을 권장합니다.
안다쇼핑
Top으로 이동